 |
| Riborg Voigt, the love
of Andersen's youth |
Hans Christian Andersen was a grown man of twenty five
when he met the one he called his first love. He reacted
like a young boy, with blushes, tears and absolute confusion.
There are indications that he felt like an old bachelor
even then.
He was both too mature and too immature for the situation. Only four years
before, he had sat, a grown-up among boys, in Slagelse Grammar School, where,
if anything, he was treated even more condescendingly than the rest, being
shrewd and knowledgeable but backward in writing and such-like accomplishments.
He was to grow at record speed, leaving a lot lying fallow.
In his diary he wrote, under March 1826:
"Got reprimanded for Greek. 'You're a dullard! You don't read, either.'
He was angry with us all; it was a bad showing."
And the next day: "Reprimanded for Latin . . . " etc., etc.
 |
| Sophie Ørsted,
daughter of Andersen's friend, the renowned Danish
physicists H. C. Ørsted. |
He at length became a young student in Copenhagen. Now
he might write again, something his benefactors had forbidden
him while at school. And he did not need telling twice.
His first efforts included the poem "The Dying Child",
which almost made him famous, and the eccentric little
book A journey on Foot from Holmen's Canal to the Eastern
Tip of Amager, an account of a short walk which early
revealed his talent for getting a lot out of little.
In 1830 the grand traveller-to-be at last obtained the wherewithal for a rather
longer journey, among other places to the towns of his native island of Funen.
At Fåborg there was a fellow-student, Voigt, he wanted to visit. He put
up at the town's inn and the next morning was received by the eldest daughter
of the house, the twenty-year-old Riborg.
 |
| For some
years Andersen was secretly infatuated with Louise,
the youngest daughter of his benefactor Jonas Collin. |
At tea, she voiced her enthusiasm for the Journey on
Foot and the poems. She blushed, was pretty and, "What
means more to me, natural".
Returning to the inn, he asked the maid, casually as it were, whom the Voigt
girls were engaged to.
They were not engaged; that is to say, the eldest, Riborg, had a sweetheart
her parents were set against, a chemist's son they thought was not up to much
- which of course was bound to make the young couple all the keener.
 |
| Collin's house
in Copenhagen. |
His normal egoistic self must have told him that here
was a good chance. But as always he hushed it and listened
to the good heart, the innocent brotherly thought, which
whispered to him: "Poor girl! So she's hopelessly
in love!"
Thus, in a way, they were in the same boat. Sympathy deepened in a tragic and
delicious fashion. He was in the house a good deal, and they talked freely
and pleasantly together; but in the first place he tried to take it all as
an experience.
That autumn, Riborg accompanied a sick friend to Copenhagen, and took care
to inform Andersen of her arrival. He was in such a flurry that when he opened
the door to her he asked after the sick lady, a complete stranger to him. She
blushed for him, as one may well understand. He was involved in a serious comedy
he was unable to perform. Courting also has its spelling, of which he knew
little, and what little he did know did not whet his appetite. Like orthography,
it was something any student could cope with, and actually beneath his dignity
to take seriously.
Nevertheless he made an effort, and talked the matter over with the girl's
brother. Encouraged by him, he fell into a swoon, trembling, blushing, weeping,
on to his bed.
Just before Riborg's departure, he gave her his strange letter of proposal,
couched in terms at once bold and cautious. It has been said that it was not
calculated to convince a young, uncertain and almost engaged girl.
 |
| Jenny Lind, "The
Swedish Nightingale". Andersen met her for
the first time in 1840. |
It is true indeed that the letter contained no hasty
promise; nothing to suggest that he would carry her off
on a white charger, which, for that matter, he would
have had to steal from the nearest country house. It
is a very realistic and very high-flown letter. "I
can become anything through you," he wrote; "anything
that you and (important addition) your parents might
wish." On the other hand, provided she was not sure
she loved the other man, "as dearly as God and eternal
salvation," he begged her not to make him unhappy.
Big offers, but also big demands. What her parents might
want was undoubtedly something as forbidding as endless
new studies and the life of a deserving civil servant.
But he, too, wanted to be loved "as dearly as God
and eternal salvation." That is implicit in his
inquiry about her feelings for the other. Otherwise,
it did not matter.
 |
| Andersen
reading fairy tales to a female audience at Frijsenborg
Manor in 1863. |
It has been said that Andersen should have "taken
her by storm", have "displayed more firmness".
The fact that he did not seems to suggest that he really
wanted a refusal. This, in my view, is not hindsight,
but hind-blindness. It was characteristic of Andersen
to be able to keep a cool head even under the utmost
emotional stress. There is, for example, a story of how
he happened to see the bare breasts of a young artist's
model, and nearly fainted; yet he was able to describe
the girl's appearance afterwards in most accurate detail.
Likewise when he was wooing. To see this characteristic
as a sign that his feelings were not whole and indivisible
is to pull the entire man apart. But why was it such
a terribly serious matter to propose to a girl who seemed
to be attracted by him; why this exaltation?
'Now I shall never get married.
No young girl grows for me any more'
How it all began
But before we hear how the story ends
we must have the beginning.
During his journey in Funen, on those August days shortly
before meeting Riborg, he had been studying churches
and church art. In St Nicholas Church in Svendborg,
for instance, he had seen a painting that he describes in his diary under August
5. It was painted by a clergyman and depicts a clergyman and his wife with
their many children. Besides the living children, he had also painted the family's
three dead babies; an odd feature, like the other that all the children are
good-looking except one of the boys. The ugly boy, however, had been painted
holding a rose, "as if to give him with that at least something beautiful," he
says of the picture in his novel Only a Fiddler. The boy with the rose is the
image of the boy violinist Christian. What the rose is for the boy in the painting,
the violin is meant to be for the poor boy in the novel.
Hans Brix, whose thesis on Andersen of 1907 has been reissued as a paperback
in 1970, did some detective work on this picture, which he thinks Andersen
must have seen while still a boy, on a journey to a sacred spring near Svendborg
that he carefully conceals. Brix thinks he did so because he was anxious to
keep secret any feature that would indicate the neurasthenia which tormented
him even as a boy. (Why he conceals this is not discussed by the professor.
The reason may be the simple one that he rightly feared that to reveal this "secret" would,
in certain eyes, brand his entire production as overstrained and peculiar.)
This journey, therefore, recalled for Andersen memories of a journey twelve
years before, memories which also include a magnificent wedding procession
through Svendborg; and one can imagine the mood this fresh encounter must have
evoked in him. A mood of having been away, on the ocean bed, while life was
going on and other people were having both brides and children. In this respect,
his own life was like a static painting. The entry in the diary describing
the family portrait ends thus:
"On either side, old tombstones, and, on the left, a black one which looks
like the plate of an iron stove. Almighty God, thee only have I; thou steerest
my fate, I must give myself up to thee! Give me a livelihood! Give me a bride!
My blood wants love, as my heart does!"
Attention has been drawn to another painting, which he saw on the same day;
a picture of a woman, whose blooming beauty had such a powerful effect because
he was forcibly reminded that now she was dust. The painting of the clergyman's
living and dead children probably contributed to this sombre mood also. And
in the singular tombstone "which looks like the plate of an iron stove" we
indeed have the whole mood concentrated. It will be no accident that it leads
straight to the plea for a bride and a livelihood.
The stove is one of his constant symbols of domestic love and warmth, as in
a further sense is the stork: the home bird that is also allowed to travel
a little away from home. Andersen's prudishness with regard to the erotic was
not an external convention. Love, longing for a bride, in him were deeply associated
with the dream of the home that he had to leave so early, and that was so quickly
broken up.
There are plenty of elements in this "old curiosity shop" of pictures
to explain the exaltation, the dilemma in the subsequent love situation. Everything
about him must have cried out to him: "Life is running out! Hasten! Take
care! You have only your little rose to hold on to."
Nevertheless he wrote his letter of proposal that autumn.
Riborg was moved, and tears flowed; the young pair seem to have nearly drowned
each other in a flood of tears. To add to the story, Riborg's parents had at
last consented to the chemist's son; he is there waiting for her when she returns
home with the fervent letter of proposal. Evidently, anything is better than
this odd poet with the popping eyes and elephant feet who would be capable
of declaiming and trampling any decent home to bits if he got into it.
Riborg's answer was a tear-stained No.
Hopelessly over- and under-mature for
the job.
'You wouldn't have an honest prince
but the swineherd you could kiss for a music-box'
This first love affair was of great
significance to Andersen as a writer. The usual irony
of fate would have it that he was accused of a tendency
to witticism and mockery when his next book appeared;
just when he had become a quite different person.
Now he has got started, he can the more easily flare up.
Two years later, he gave his fine Life Story to Louise Collin, the young daughter
of the house that had so early opened its doors to him and kept them open.
This early autobiography has been found and published in fairly recent years.
It gives a fullish account of the affair with Riborg. (In The Fairy Tate of
My Life, the long autobiography that he published himself, it is reduced almost
to nothing.) When he wrote the Life Story, the experience was still fresh,
and he describes it for the young Louise as something very central. But there
is nothing about Louise herself except that he had never noticed her as a child.
The Life Story is generally regarded as a sort of extended proposal to Louise.
As such, it is, if anything, even less tactical or seductive than the letter
to Riborg. Yet it was definitely meant to win her, testifying to a pride usually
associated with other ages and indicating that, in a way, he was the courting
bachelor right from the first. Helplessly over- and under-mature for the job!
Louise hardly knew what answer to give to so great an honour; and so gave no
answer. It distressed Andersen, of course, who felt he had given her his whole
soul and mind in this self-portrait - and yet not even an answer!
Soon after, Louise became engaged, and they became friends for life.
Something like the same pattern emerges in his love for the young daughter,
Sophie, of his friend H. C. Ørsted. Except that now he is even more
hesitant. "A bride - a livelihood" have become ideas that are still
more inseparably identified. He writes serio-comically somewhere: "I must
have 1,000 a year before I dare fall in love, and 1,500 before I dare marry;
and before the semi-impossible occurs, the girl is gone, captured by another,
and I am an old wizened bachelor. They are sorry prospects!"
On the evening Sophie became engaged (evidently they set aside special evenings
for that in those days) he wrote in his diary:
"This Christmas I think I told her what could never be good for her! Now
I shall never get married; no young girl grows for me any more, day by day I
become more of an old bachelor! Oh, even yesterday I was among young people!
tonight I am old! God bless you, dear beloved Sophie; you will never know how
happy I could have been, affluent and with you!",
But now at any rate the rest of us know. In a writer's love stories one should
never underrate the element known as "publication of intimate emotions".
When he wrote to Riborg, she had the tact to return his letter (he had asked
her either to destroy it or return it), but Louise was unfeeling enough to
keep the one to her. Thus he could use his first letter of proposal as part
of his autobiographical wooing of Louise, but the love for her had to be transformed
into poetic fairy tales and novels. And we can probably thank Sophie for the
little bitter-sweet tale about the butterfly that could not decide on any of
the flowers until it was too late. With the years, he grew more careful about
frittering his golden prose on wooing. Later, people knew they had to look
after the precious letters; and he based his memoirs for a large part on letters
he "borrowed back". He used his friends like a diary!
Many friends, male and female
His male and female friends. He had
lots of the latter. Clearly, he was neither shy nor
afraid of the sex; it was not there that the bachelordom
lay. He called his own temperament "half feminine":
which, especially in 1975, proclaimed as "international
women's year", must be seen against the general
sex-role patterns of the time. There was no particular
underlying hormonal disposition. The fact that he found
it so easy to associate with and understand women was
no doubt connected with the circumstance that his own
social situation in many respects resembled the classical
woman's role: he was a treasure, and a treasure must
be seen and not heard. He was deeply dependent on other
people's assessment, appreciation and favour; exactly
like contemporary women, whose only social potentiality
lay mostly in the ability to get accepted by the sex
in power. If there was no suggestion of discrimination
in him, the reasons were neither ideological nor moral:
his whole psychological method was so alien to generalizations
and systematizations that anything of the sort was
excluded. To him, all were unique. Today we would consider
these characteristics, which he calls "half feminine",
something very advanced. What his contemporaries regarded
as weakness, we can now begin to envisage as strength.
And precisely this natural feeling of equality was a hindrance to him when
he went wooing. In the courting situation one had to be, as it were, unequal;
one had to go down on one's knees. And his intuition told him that it was as
degrading a situation for the one knelt to as for the one kneeling. He tried
feverishly to dodge the issue: he always preferred to be absent while the girl
was thinking over his little proposal.
His last great love is said to have been the Swedish singer Jenny Lind, who
had a little of his own background of poverty, and the same naturalness and
warmheartedness at the centre of her art. At one point he handed her a letter, "which
she could not fail to understand", at some juncture that prevented him
from seeing the reaction. She did not reply; but neither did she get engaged
all at once. Apparently, she was quite unaffected.
The relationship grew into a close and enduring friendship. In The Fairy Tate
of My Life he tells of a little event at Christmas 1845, when both were in
Berlin. He complains about not having heard from her; he had been so sure of
being with her that he had refused every other invitation (though he writes
that he is only telling her this). This is greatly exaggerated, but she takes
it literally, pats him on the cheek, and says "Child!" Whereafter
she decorates a Christmas tree for the New Year, where all the presents are
for him, but where there is also a lady friend present, to avoid any misunderstanding.
I do not think one needs to have any other details about Andersen and Jenny
Lind in order to appreciate how beautifully she knew how to transform undesired
passions into a sisterly-motherly poetry, which he drank from in full draughts.
Andersen so arranged it that a leather pouch was found round his neck when
he died, a pouch containing a letter from Riborg. The letter was to be burnt
unread. He could not possibly have worn this all his life: as the matter-of-fact
Professor Brix observed, it would have fallen to pieces. So it was arranged.
And what then? Attitudinizing can in some cases be the last resort in getting
things said, also (or especially) in the case of great artists.
Attitudinizing can be most genuine; can, as art, be the point where a person
lives full out, more genuine and more wide-ranging than in reality.
 |
 |
| Anderesen's
pouch and the note about it by Jonas Collin J.: "This
leather pouch was found on the chest of Hans
Christian Andersen after his death. It contained
a long letter from the love of his youth, Riborg
Voigt. I burned the letter without reading it.
J. Collin." |
In Andersen's heart there was more than
the ugly duckling that became a swan, or the happy
witless Clodpoll. His life was a fine fairy tale: not
an almanac story about how all turns out as it should
and the best man wins. In his heart there were also
the Little Mermaid, who was drawn to an element in
which she had to die; the Mother, who was good for
something, though she ended up in drink; the Snowman
that with unerring tragedy fell in love with a stove;
and, Apropos wooing, the Prince who had to humble himself,
disguising himself as a swineherd and pop artist, in
order to have any chance at all with the stupid princess. "You
wouldn't have an honest prince ... but the swineherd
you kiss for a musical-box!"
That was Andersen's judgement on the world when he was in a baleful mood. But
it is seldom that his knowledge of the wasted, the rejected, the failed devolves
into severity. You would not have the best, nor the next-best in me: or what
everyone else can imitate!
The old bachelor found his quiet home in the end, in his own good company.
He is said to have remarked as an old man: "Now I only go out once a week,
so they can please themselves!"
But he did want to be found wearing
that leather pouch. Perhaps because it testified to
his inmost pride: fidelity to all that was lost. Like
the clergyman's painting that wanted to include the
reality of death on equal terms with that of life.
A testimony to everything that never came to anything
- though it was good for something.
Taken from the Danish Journal.
|